Concepções de futuros docentes de Matemática no contexto da argumentação
Resumo
Objetivo desta pesquisa é caracterizar as concepções matemáticas de futuros docentes na resolução de equações diferenciais ordinárias no contexto da argumentação. Os conceitos de “argumentação coletiva”, “concepções matemáticas” e “equações diferenciais ordinárias” constituem o enquadramento conceitual da pesquisa, refletidos na implantação do modelo enriquecido de Toulmin, uma ferramenta metodológica que permite reconstruir as concepções dos professores a partir da argumentação matemática. Os resultados da pesquisa indicam que as concepções matemáticas de futuros docentes estão fundamentadas nos sistemas de representação e nas formas para comprovar soluções de equações diferenciais ordinárias para o caso das curvas ortogonais.
Downloads
Referências
Alsina, A. (2012). Proceso de transformación de las concepciones del profesorado sobre la resolución de problemas matemáticos. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 30(3), 71-88.
Balacheff, N. (2013). cKc, a model to reason on learners' conceptions. En M. V. Martinez & A. Castro, Psychology of Mathematics Education, North American Chapter (pp. 2-15). Chicago.
Clemente, F. & Llinares, S. (2015). Formas del discurso y razonamiento configural de estudiantes para maestros en la resolución de problemas de geometría. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 33(1), 9-27.
Conner, M. (2008). Expanded Toulmin diagrams: a tool for investigating complex activity in classrooms. En O. Figueras, J. Cortina, S. Alatorre, T. Rojano & A. Sepúlveda (eds.), Proceedings of International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 361- 368), México, Morelia.
Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington, dc: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and Council of Chief State School Officers. Recuperado de: http://www.corestandards.org/wp-content/uploads/Math_Standards.pdf
Conner, M. (2013). Authentic argumentation with prospective secondary teachers: the case of 0.99. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 1, 172-180.
https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteaceduc.1.2.0172
Conner, A., Singletary, L., Smith, R., Wagner, P. & Francisco, R. (2014). Teacher support for collective argumentation: a framework for examining how teachers support students' engagement in mathematical activities, Educational Studies Mathematics, 86 (2), 401-429.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9532-8
Eemeren, H. van & Grootendorst, R. (2014). Developments in argumentation theory. Recuperado de: http://www.dwc.knaw.nl/DL/publications/PU00010570.pdf
Flores, E. & Carrillo, J. (2014). Connecting a mathematics teacher's conceptions and specialized knowledge through her practice. En S. Oesterle, P. Liljedahl, P., C. Nicol & D. Allan (eds.), Proceedings of the Joint Meeting 3-81of pme 38 and pme -na 36, 3 (vol. 3, pp. 81-88). Vancouver: PME.
Hernández, R., Fernández, C. & Baptista, M. (2010). Metodología de la investigación. México: McGraw-Hill.
Hill, H. C. & Ball, D. L. (2004). Learning mathematics for teaching: results from California's mathematics professional development institutes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(5), 330-351.
https://doi.org/10.2307/30034819
Inglis, M., Mejía-Ramos, J. P. & Simpson, A. (2007). Modeling mathematical argumentation: The importance of qualification. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(1), 3-21.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9059-8
Juárez, J. A. & Inzunsa, S. (2014). Comprensión y razonamiento de profesores de matemáticas de bachillerato sobre conceptos estadísticos básicos. Perfiles Educativos, 36(146), 14-23.
https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.24486167e.2014.146.46024
Knuth, E. J. (2002). Secondary school mathematics teachers' conceptions of proof. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(5), 379-405.
https://doi.org/10.2307/4149959
Krummheuer, G. (1995). The ethnology of argumentation. En P. Cobb & H. Bauersfeld (eds.), The emergence of mathematical meaning: interaction in classroom cultures (pp. 229-269). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Krummheuer, G. (2007). Argumentation and participation in the primary mathematics classroom. Two episodes and related theoretical abductions. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 26(1), 60-82.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2007.02.001
Leiria, A. C., González, M. T. & Pinto, J. E. (2015). Conocimiento del profesor sobre pensamiento estadístico. PNA, 10(1), 25-52.
Nardi, E., Biza, I. & Zachariades, T. (2012). "Warrant" revisited: integrating mathematics teachers pedagogical and epistemological considerations into Toulmin's model for argumentation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(1), 157-173. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9345-y
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9345-y
Pedemonte, B. & Balacheff, N. (2016). Establishing links between conceptions, argumentation and proof through the cKc-enriched Toulmin model. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 41, 104-122.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2015.10.008
Pinto, J. E. (2010). Conocimiento didáctico del contenido sobre la representación de datos estadísticos: estudios de casos con profesores de estadística en carreras de psicología y educación (Tesis doctoral inédita). Departamento de Didáctica de la Matemática y de las Ciencias Experimentales, Universidad de Salamanca.
Ruiz, O. F., Márquez, C. & Tamayo O. E. (2014). Cambio en las concepciones de los docentes sobre la argumenta- ción y su desarrollo en clase de ciencias. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 32(3), 53-70.
https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.985
Salinas, N. & N. Sgreccia. (2017). Concepciones docentes acerca de la resolución de Problemas en la escuela secundaria. Revista Números, 94, 23-45.
Simon, M. (2000). Research on the development of mathematics teacher: the teacher development experiment. En A. Kelly & R. Lesh (eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 335- 359). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Toulmin, S. (2003). The uses of argument. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840005
Toulmin, S. E., Rieke, R. D. & Janik, A. (1984). An introduction to reasoning (2a ed.). Nueva York, Londres: Macmillan.
Valverde, G. (2014). Experimentos de enseñanza: una alternativa metodológica para investigar en el contexto de la formación inicial de docentes. Revista Electrónica "Actualidades Investigativas en Educación", 14(3), 1-20.
Varghese, T. (2009). Secondary-level student teachers' conceptions of mathematical proof. IUMPST: The Journal, 1, 1-14.
Wagner, P., Conner, A., Singletary, L. & Francisco, R. (2014). Using Toulmin's model to develop prospective secondary mathematics teachers' conceptions of collective argumentation. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 3(1), 8-26.
https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteaceduc.3.1.0008
Whitenack, J. & Knipping, N. (2002). Argumentation, instructional design theory and student's mathematical learning: a case for coordinating interpretive lenses. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24(4), 441-457.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(02)00144-X
Yackel, E. (2002). What we can learn from analyzing the teacher's role in collective argumentation. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21, 423-440.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(02)00143-8
Zill, D. G. (1997). Ecuaciones diferenciales (6a ed.). México: Thomson.
