Comparison between Face-to-Face and Remote Learning for Teaching Automatic Control Systems

Keywords: control education, teaching tools, linear control systems, e-learning

Abstract

This paper presents a comparison between face-to-face and remote teaching of a university level course on automatic control systems. A set of learning activities is proposed to teach and evaluate the course. These activities aim to strengthen problem solving, teamwork, communication and self-learning skills. The activities were developed using the interactive learning applications: Matlab Grader, Matlab Live Scripts, Google Classroom, Google Meet and Google Docs. A survey applied to students who took the course face-to-face in 2019 and remotely during 2020 showed the advantages of the remote approach for most aspects of each of the skills mentioned. However, students perceived that their contribution to teamwork was greater when they were in a physical classroom. Course grades improved by an average of 10 % for the remote modality.

Author Biographies

Diego Alberto Bravo Montenegro, Universidad del Cauca, Colombia

Doctor en Ciencias de la Electrónica, Universidad del Cauca, Colombia.
Correo electrónico: dibravo@unicauca.edu.co ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7041-3183

Carlos Felipe Rengifo Rodas, Universidad del Cauca, Colombia

Doctorat en Automatique, Ecole Centrale de Nantes. Universidad del Cauca, Colombia.
Correo electrónico: caferen@unicauca.edu.co ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0601-3481

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Diego Alberto Bravo Montenegro, Universidad del Cauca, Colombia

Doctor en Ciencias de la Electrónica, Universidad del Cauca, Colombia.
Correo electrónico: dibravo@unicauca.edu.co ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7041-3183

Carlos Felipe Rengifo Rodas, Universidad del Cauca, Colombia

Doctorat en Automatique, Ecole Centrale de Nantes. Universidad del Cauca, Colombia.
Correo electrónico: caferen@unicauca.edu.co ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0601-3481

References

Al-Khazraji, A. y Ismaeel, S. (2020). Efficient Practices on Teaching Modeling and Simulation for Engineers. 2020 IEEE Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE) (pp. 1-4). Londres: IEEE Xplore. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CCECE47787.2020.9255788

Arévalo, V., Vicente-del-Rey, J., García-Morales, I. y Rivas-Blanco, I. (s.f.). Minivideos tutoriales como apoyo al aprendizaje de conceptos básicos para un curso de Fundamentos de Control Automático. Revista Iberoamericana de Automática e Informática industrial, 17(2), 107-115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4995/riai.2020.12156

Bravo M, D. A. y Rengifo R., C. F. (2014). Herramienta para la enseñanza de las ecuaciones de Lagrange basada en la simulación de sistemas dinámicos. Revista mexicana de física E, 60(2), 111-115.

Chow, J. H. y Cheung, K. W. (1992). A toolbox for power system dynamics and control engineering education and research. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 7(4), 1559-1564. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/59.207380

González González, C., Fardoun, H., Collazos, C. y Yousef, M. (2020). Estudio exploratorio en Iberoamérica sobre procesos de enseñanza-aprendizaje y propuesta de evaluación en tiempos de pandemia. Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS), 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.23537

Hayashi, Y., Fukamachi, K. y Komatsugawa, H. (2015). Collaborative Learning in Computer Programming Courses That Adopted the Flipped Classroom. International Conference on Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering (pp. 209-212). Taipei. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/LaTiCE.2015.43

Heradio, R., Torre, L. d. y Dormido., S. (2016). Virtual and remote labs in control education: A survey. Annual Reviews in Control, 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2016.08.001

Khan, S., Jaffery, M. H., Hanif, A. y Asif, M. R. (2017). Teaching Tool for a Control Systems Laboratory Using a Quadrotor as a Plant in Matlab. IEEE Transactions on Education, 60(4), 249-256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2017.2653762

Fernández-Samacá, L., Ramírez-Scarpetta, J. M. y a Orozco-Gutiérrez, M. L. (2012). Project-based learning approach for control system courses. Sba: Controle & Automação Sociedade Brasileira de Automatica, 23(1), 94-107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-17592012000100008

Gil Galván, R., Martín Espinosa, I. y Gil Galván, F. J. (2020). Percepciones de los estudiantes universitarios sobre las competencias adquiridas mediante el aprendizaje basado en problemas. Educación XX1, 271-295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.26800

Rengifo, C. F. y Bravo, D. A. (2020). A Project-Based Learning Approach to Teach Identification and Control Systems. IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologías del Aprendizaje, 15(1), 10-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/RITA.2020.2979171

Unesco. (2020). Education: From disruption to recovery. Obtenido de https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse

Vargas, H., Sánchez, J., Jara, C., Candelas, F., Reinoso, O. y Díez, J. (2010). Docencia en Automática: aplicación de las TIC a la realización de actividades prácticas a través de Internet. Revista Iberoamericana de Automática e Informática Industrial, RIAI, 35-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1697-7912(10)70006-6

How to Cite
Bravo Montenegro, D. A., & Rengifo Rodas, C. F. (2022). Comparison between Face-to-Face and Remote Learning for Teaching Automatic Control Systems. Academia Y Virtualidad, 15(2), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.18359/ravi.5733
Published
2022-12-23
Section
Articles

Altmetric

Crossref Cited-by logo
QR Code

Some similar items: