Riesgo de automatización de empleos en Colombia

un análisis de los determinantes de la vulnerabilidad de los trabajadores ante la disrupción tecnológica

  • Andrés José Morales Pantoja Universidad del Cauca
  • Karen Liseth Atis Ortega Universidad EAFIT
  • Claudia Liceth Fajardo Hoyos Universidad del Cauca
Palabras clave: empleo, modelo lineal generalizado, automatización de empleos, mercado laboral, progreso tecnológico

Resumen

El impacto de las nuevas tecnologías en los resultados del mercado laboral ha sido estudiado extensamente en todo el mundo. Sin embargo, en Colombia hay pocos estudios que aborden sistemáticamente este tema central para el futuro de nuestra economía. Por lo tanto, este estudio tiene como objetivo analizar la proporción de trabajadores cuyas ocupaciones tienen un alto riesgo de ser reemplazadas por la tecnología en Colombia. También explora las características personales, ocupacionales y empresariales que hacen que los trabajadores sean vulnerables a la cuarta revolución industrial. Utilizamos un Modelo Lineal Generalizado (GLM, por sus siglas en inglés) para demostrar que más de un tercio de los trabajadores tienen empleos con un alto riesgo de automatización. Sin embargo, variables como el nivel educativo, la formación laboral, el sector económico, entre otros, sirven como factores significativos que mitigan los impactos negativos del progreso tecnológico en el empleo.

Biografía del autor/a

Andrés José Morales Pantoja, Universidad del Cauca

Public Accountant and Economist, Universidad del Cauca. Research Assistant, Entropy Group, Universidad
del Cauca.

Karen Liseth Atis Ortega, Universidad EAFIT

Economist Universidad del Cauca, Master’s degree in Economics and professor at the Universidad EAFIT.
Member of the Cauca Feminist Economy group. Entropy Researcher Group.

Claudia Liceth Fajardo Hoyos, Universidad del Cauca

PhD(C) Business Economics Icesi University. Master’s degree in applied Economics and Economist of Universidad del Valle. Master’s degree in Economics Icesi University. Associate Professor, Department of Economics, Universidad del Cauca. Entropy Researcher Group. ormet Cauca Coordinator and Cauca Feminist Economy group Coordinator. Researcher on Feminist Economics and the labor market. Recognized by the Ministry of Science, Technology, and Innovation of Colombia as a junior researcher.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Andrés José Morales Pantoja, Universidad del Cauca

Public Accountant and Economist, Universidad del Cauca. Research Assistant, Entropy Group, Universidad
del Cauca.

Karen Liseth Atis Ortega, Universidad EAFIT

Economist Universidad del Cauca, Master’s degree in Economics and professor at the Universidad EAFIT.
Member of the Cauca Feminist Economy group. Entropy Researcher Group.

Claudia Liceth Fajardo Hoyos, Universidad del Cauca

PhD(C) Business Economics Icesi University. Master’s degree in applied Economics and Economist of Universidad del Valle. Master’s degree in Economics Icesi University. Associate Professor, Department of Economics, Universidad del Cauca. Entropy Researcher Group. ormet Cauca Coordinator and Cauca Feminist Economy group Coordinator. Researcher on Feminist Economics and the labor market. Recognized by the Ministry of Science, Technology, and Innovation of Colombia as a junior researcher.

Referencias bibliográficas

Acemoglu, D. and Autor, D. (2011). Skills, tasks and technologies: Implications for employment and earnings. Handbook of Labor Economics, 4: 1043-1171. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(11)02410-5

Acemoglu, D., and Restrepo, P. (2018). The race between Man and Machine: Implications of Technology for Growth, Factor Shares, and Employment. American Economic Review 108 (6). pp. 1488-1542.https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20160696

Acemoglu, D., and Restrepo, P. (2019). Automation and new tasks: how technology displaces and reinstates labor. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(2), 3-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.33.2.3

Acemoglu, D., and Restrepo, P. (2020). Robots and jobs: Evidence from US labor markets. Journal of political economy, 128(6), 2188-2244. https://doi.org/10.1086/705716

Aghion, P., Jones, B. and Jones, C. (2017). Artificial Intelligence and Economic Growth. NBER Working Paper, 23928, National Bureau of Economic Research.https://doi.org/10.3386/w23928

Aghion, P., Antonin, C., Bunel, S., and Jaravel, X. (2020). What are the labor and product market effects of automation? New evidence from France. From: https://sciencespo.hal.science/hal-03403062/file/2020-aghion-what-are-the-labor-and-product-market-effects-of-automation.pdf

Arntz, M., Gregory, T., and Zierahn, U. (2016). The risk of automation for jobs in OECD countries. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlz9h56dvq7-en

Autor, D., and Dorn, D. (2013). The growth of low skill service jobs and the polarization of the US labor market. American Economic Review 103 (5). pp. 1553-1597. DOI: 10.1257/aer.103.5.1553

Autor, D., Levy, F., and Murnane, R.J. (2003). The skill content of recent technological change: an empirical exploration. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 118 (4), pp. 1279-1333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/003355303322552801

Brambilla, I., César, A., Falcone, G., Gasparini, L., and Lombardo, C. (2021). The risk of automation in Latin America (No. 281). https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/250370

Boustan, L. P., Choi, J., and Clingingsmith, D. (2022). Automation after the assembly line: Computerized machine tools, employment and productivity in the United States (No. w30400). National Bureau of Economic Research.https://doi.org/10.3386/w30400

Chang, J. H., and Huynh, P. (2016). ASEAN in transformation the future of jobs at risk of automation (No. 994906463402676). International Labour Organization. From: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_dialogue/---act_emp/documents/publication/wcms_579554.pdf

DANE. (2019). Microdatos Gran Encuesta Integrada de Hogares GEIH. From: https://microdatos.dane.gov.co//catalog/599/get_microdata

Doménech, R., García, J. R., Montañez, M., and Neut, A. (2018). Afectados por la revolución digital: el caso de España. Papeles de Economía Española, (156), 128-145. From: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6519001

Eckardt, M. S. (2022). Minimum wages in an automating economy. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 24(1), 58-91.https://doi.org/10.1111/jpet.12528

Gravina, A. F., and Pappalardo, M. R. (2022). Are robots in rich countries a threat for employment in emerging economies? Economics Letters, 221, 110888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2022.110888

Frey, C. B., and Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerization? Technological forecasting and social change, 114, 254-280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019

Hawksworth, J., Audino, H., and Clarry, R. (2017). The Long View: How will the global economic order change by 2050. London, UK: PWC. From: https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/world-2050/assets/pwc-the-world-in-2050-full-report-feb-2017.pdf

Ing, L. Y., and Zhang, R. (2022). Automation in Indonesia: Productivity, Quality, and Employment. In Robots and AI (pp. 275-309)https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003275534-9

Katz, R., Callorda, F., and Jung, J. (2023). The impact of automation on employment and its social implications: evidence from Chile. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 32(5), 646-662. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2021.1991798

Li, J., An, Z., and Wang, Y. (2023). On the Substitution and Complementarity between Robots and Labor: Evidence from Advanced and Emerging Economies. Sustainability, 15(12), 9790. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129790

Lima, Y., Strauch, J. C. M., Esteves, M. G. P., de Souza, J. M., Chaves, M. B., and Gomes, D. T. (2021). Exploring the future impact of automation in Brazil. Employee Relations: The International Journal, 43(5), 1052-1066.https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-08-2020-0364

Lorenz, H., Stephany, F., and Kluge, J. (2023). The future of employment revisited: how model selection affects digitization risks. Empirica, 50(2), 323-350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-023-09571-2

Minian, I., and Martínez, Á. (2018). El impacto de las nuevas tecnologías en el empleo en México. Revista problemas del desarrollo, 49 (195), 27-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/iiec.20078951e.2018.195.64001

Papke, L. E., and Wooldridge, J. M. (1996). Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401 (k) plan participation rates. Journal of applied econometrics, 11(6), 619-632. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1255(199611)11:6<619::AID-JAE418>3.0.CO;2-1

Santos, I., Monroy-Taborda, S. and Moreno, M. (2015) Technological change and labor market disruptions: evidence from developing world. Background paper for the World Development Report 2016. From: https://conference.iza.org/conference_files/worldb2015/monroy-taborda_s22138.pdf

Cómo citar
Morales Pantoja, A. J., Atis Ortega, K. L., & Fajardo Hoyos, C. L. (2023). Riesgo de automatización de empleos en Colombia: un análisis de los determinantes de la vulnerabilidad de los trabajadores ante la disrupción tecnológica. Revista Facultad De Ciencias Económicas, 31(2), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.18359/rfce.6723
Publicado
2023-12-15
Sección
Artículos

Métricas

Crossref Cited-by logo
QR Code

Algunos artículos similares: