Latin America at a Crossroads: A Cultural Theory to Address the Wicked Problem of Regional Integration with Clumsy Solutions

Abstract

Latin America is at a crossroads. Its efforts to integrate are undergoing significant changes. In this light, integration has been regarded as a wicked problem. Contra convention, such approach suggests that wicked problems, being social problems, may have an indefinite number of solutions. This article builds on that argument and, in order to make it workable, proposes gridgroup cultural theory as a framework to reduce its complexity while taking its inherent pluralityseriously. In brief, this theory focuses on how individual decision-making is influenced by the collective (group) or by institutions (grid). The combination of these two dimensions provides four rationalities, ways of life, or worldviews: hierarchy, individualism, egalitarianism, and fatalism. Latin American integration initiatives can be found within this limited diversity scheme to address this wicked problem and hint at appropriate solutions, clumsy ones. They require the inclusion of all rationalities in constructive dialogue seeking not to leave them worse off.

Author Biography

Pablo Garcés Velástegui, Instituto de Altos Estudios Nacionales del Ecuador; Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador

Magíster en Relaciones Internacionales por la Universität Bremen, Bremen; Magíster en Política Pública por el Hertie School of Governance, Berlín; Magíster en Administración Pública por el London School of Economics and Political Science, Londres. Profesor auxiliar en el Instituto de Altos Estudios Nacionales del Ecuador y en la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Pablo Garcés Velástegui, Instituto de Altos Estudios Nacionales del Ecuador; Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador

Magíster en Relaciones Internacionales por la Universität Bremen, Bremen; Magíster en Política Pública por el Hertie School of Governance, Berlín; Magíster en Administración Pública por el London School of Economics and Political Science, Londres. Profesor auxiliar en el Instituto de Altos Estudios Nacionales del Ecuador y en la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador.

References

ALADI. (2018). Quienes somos. Retrieved from http://www.aladi.org/sitioAladi/quienesSomos.html

Aphelthaler, G. & Domicone, H. (2008). Drawing wrong borderlines: the concept of culture in a pluralist management world. Problems and Perspective in Management, 6(2), 44-58

Arenas-García, N. (2012). 21st Century Regionalism in South America: UNASUR and the Search for Development Alternatives, eSharp, 18: 64-85

Balassa, B. (1961a). The Theory of Economic Integration. Abingdon, UK: Routledge

Balassa, B. (1961b). Towards a Theory of Economic Integration. Kyklos International Review for Social Sciences, 14(1), 1-17

Bell, W. (1997). An Anthropological View of How Organizations Think. Working Paper 16/97. Monash University Faculty of Business & Economics.

Bernal-Meza, R. (2013). Modelos o esquemas de integración y cooperación en curso en América Latina (UNASUR, Alianza del Pacífico, ALBA, CELAC) una vista panorámica. Berlin: Ibero-Amerikanisches Institut

CAN. (1969). Andean Subregional Integration Agreement, Cartagena Agreement

CAN. (2018). Sistem Andino de Integración. Retrieved from: http://www.comunidadandina.org/Seccion.aspx?tipo=QU

CAN- General Secretariat. (2009). 40 años de integración andina: Avances y Perspectivas. Revista de la Integración, núm. 4.

CEPAL. (2012). 30 años de integración comercial en la ALADI. Montevideo: ALADI

Couriel, A. y Moreira, C. (2013) UNASUR: La unidad de América Latina para la cooperación y la integración. In C. Silva & C. Martins (2013), Nuevos Escenarios para la Integración de América Latina (pp. 303-324), Buenos Aires: CLACSO, Grupo de Trabajo Integración Regional y Unión Latinoamericana.

Coyle, D. (1994). The Theory That Would Be King. In Coyle, Dennis and Richard Ellis (eds). Politics, Policy, and Culture (pp: 219-239). Boulder, CO: Westview Press

Douglas, M. (1982). In the Acting Voice. Boston, US: Routledge & Kegan Paul

Espinosa, E. (2013). ALBA: Teoría y práctica de la integración regional. Una visión desde el Sur. In C. Silva & C. Martins (2013), Nuevos Escenarios para la Integración de América Latina (pp. 273-302), Buenos Aires: CLACSO, Grupo de Trabajo Integración Regional y Unión Latinoamericana.

Freeden, M. (1996). Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach, Clarendon: Oxford University Press.

Garcés, P. (2015). Organization, power and leadership: a cultural approach. Revista PUCE, 101, 89-110

Garcés, P. (2018). Latin American integration as a wicked problem: the case for a plural approach, Revista de Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridad, 13(1), 93-117

Hollis, M. (1994). The Philosophy of Social Science: an introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

Hollis, M & Smith, S. (1990). Explaining and Understanding International Relations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Hood, C. (1998). The Art of the State: Culture, Rhetoric and Public Management. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press

Lockhart, C. (1998). The Social Construction of Cooperation: Egalitarian, Hierarchical, and Individualistic Faces of Altruism. In S-K. Chai & B. Swedlow (eds). Culture and Social Theory / Aaron Wildavsky (pp: 113-131). London, UK: Transaction Publishers

MERCOSUR. (1991). Treaty Establishing a Common Market between the Argentine Republic, the Federal Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Eastern Republic of Uruguay, Treaty of Asunción

MERCOSUR. (2016). Mercosur: Structure and Agendas. Retrieved from http://www.mercosur.int/innovaportal/v/7481/10/innova.front/what-is-mercosur-_-mercosul

Nye, J. & Welch, D. (2014). Understanding Global Conflict and Cooperation: Into to theory and history, ninth edition. Essex, UK: Pearson Education Limited

Preciado, J. & Florido, A. (2013). La Comunidad de Estados Latinoamericanos y Caribeños (CELAC); integración “postneoliberal”, neoliberal ortodoxa y contrahegemónica. In C. Silva & C. Martins (2013), Nuevos Escenarios para la Integración de América Latina (pp. 187-214), Buenos Aires: CLACSO, Grupo de Trabajo Integración Regional y Unión Latinoamericana.

Quijano, J. (2011). El MERCOSUR 20 años después. In Caetano, G (Ed.), Mercosur 20 años ( pp. 89-127) Montevideo, Uruguay: Centro de formación para la integración regional, FES, GIZ, Somos Mercosur

Regueiro, L. & Barzaga, M. (2012). Unasur: proceso y propuesta. Quito, Ecuador: Fedaeps

SELA. (2014). Evolución del Sistema de Integración Centroamericano (SICA)

SICA. (2018). Corte Centroamericana de justicia. Retrieved from: https://www.sica.int/consulta/entidades.aspx?IdEnt=432&Indv=2&IdmStyle=1&Idm=1

Thompson, M. et al. (1990). Cultural Theory. Oxford et al: Westview Press.

Thompson, M. (2003). Cultural Theory, Climate Change and Clumsiness. Economic and Political Weekly, 38(48), 5107-5112.

Thompson, M. & Ellis, R. (1998). Introduction: Political Cultures. In Chai, Sun-Ki and Brendon Swedlow (eds). Culture and Social Theory / Aaron Wildavsky (pp: 1-13). London, UK: Transaction Publishers

Valdez, J. (2013) CELAC: expectativas y realidades. In A. Bonilla & M. Ortiz. (Eds.) De Madrid a Santiago: Retos y Oportunidades (pp: 219-222), Quito, Ecuador: Flacso

Verweii, M. & Thompson, M. (eds). (1998). Clumsy Solutions for a Complex World. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave

Verweij, M. et al. (2006). Clumsy Solutions for a complex world: the case of climate change. Public Administration, 84(4), 817-843

Verweij, M. (2011). Clumsy Solutions for a Wicked World: how to improve global governance. Palgrave Macmillan

Weber, M. (1947). The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York, US: Oxford University Press

How to Cite
Garcés Velástegui, P. (2020). Latin America at a Crossroads: A Cultural Theory to Address the Wicked Problem of Regional Integration with Clumsy Solutions. Revista De Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia Y Seguridad, 14(2), 33–57. https://doi.org/10.18359/ries.2889
Published
2020-02-28

Altmetric

QR Code

Some similar items: