Influencia de los Surfactantes en la Remediación de Suelos Contaminados con Hidrocarburo

  • Héctor Hugo Riojas González Instituto Tecnológico de Sonora.
  • Pablo Gortáres Moroyoqui Instituto Tecnológico de Sonora.
  • Iram Mondaca Fernández Instituto Tecnológico de Sonora.
  • José de Jesús Balderas Cortes Instituto Tecnológico de Sonora.
Palabras clave: Adsorción, interfase, petróleo, propiedades químicas, lavado de suelo.


La aplicación de los surfactantes en un proceso de remediación de suelo contaminado con hidrocarburos llevado a cabo por un lavado de suelo, que está condicionado por las propiedades fisicoquímicas del surfactante entre las que se destacan, la adsorción en interfases, emulsión, HLB, tensión en interfase y superficie, CMC, movilidad, formación de micelas, solubilidad y punto nube. En la presente revisión se describen y se discuten las propiedades de los surfactantes que influyen en el potencial para la remediación. Además se analizan las principales variables del lavado de suelo en presencia de surfactantes, tales como los coeficientes de adsorción-desorción, mojabilidad y ángulo de contacto.


La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.

Referencias Bibliográficas

Abdul AD, Gibson TL, Rai DN. 1990. Selection of surfactants for the removal of petroleum products from shallow sandy aquifer. Ground Water. 28, 920–926

Almgren M, Grieser F, Thomas JK. 1979. Dynamic and static aspects of solubilization of neutral arenes in ionic micellar solutions. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 101, 279–291.

Anderson JW, McQuerry PL, Kiesser SL. 1985. Laboratory Evaluation of Chemical Dispersants for Use on Oil Spills at Sea. Env. Sci. Tech. 19(5), 454-457.

Cardona SA. 2007. Obtención del coeficiente de carbono orgánico para diesel a través de isotermas de adsorción. Dyna 74(153), pp 159-165.

Childs J, Acosta E, Scamehorn JF, Sabatini DA. 2005. Surfactant-Enhanced Treatment of Oil-Based Drill Cutting. Journal of Energy Resources Technology. 127 (2), 153-162.

Chu W. 2003. Remediation of Contaminated Soils by Surfactant-Aided Soil Washing. Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management, ASCE, 7(1), 19-24.

Chu W y Chan KH. 2000. The prediction of partitioning coefficients for chemicals causing environmental concern. Sci Total Environ, 248, 1 –10.

Chu W y Chan KH. 2003. The mechanism of the surfactant-aided soil washing system for hydrophobic and partial hydrophobic organics. The Science of the Total Environment, 307, 83–92.

Chu W, Chan KH, Choy WK. 2005. The Partitioning and Modelling of Pesticide Parathion in a Surfactant-Assisted Soil-Washing System. Chemosphere 64, 711-716.

Chu W y Kwan CY. 2003. Remediation of contaminated soil by a solvent/surfactant system. Chemosphere. 53, 9−15.

Deschênes L, Lafrance P, Villeneuve JP, Samson R. 1995. The effect of an anionic surfactant on the mobilization and biodégradation of PAHs in a creosote-contaminated soil. Hydrological Sciences Journal des Sciences Hydrologiques. 40(4), 471-484.

Deshpande S, Shiau BJ, Wade D, Sabatini DA, Harwell JH. 1999. Surfactant selection for enhancing ex situ soil washing. Wat. Res. 33, 351–360.

Dipak R, Minwen LM, Guang-te W. 1994. Modeling of anthracene removal from soil columns by surfactant. Environ. Sci. Health A-29, 197-213.

Donaldson EC, Chilingarian GV, Yen TF. 1989. Developments in Petroleum Science 17B, Enhanced Oil Recovery. II. Processes and Operation. New York, Elsevier Science Publishing Company.

Ehsan S, Prasher SO, Marshall WD. 2006. Awashing procedure to mobilize mixed contaminants from soil: II. Heavy metals. J. Environ. Qual. 35, 2084–2091.

Fuangswasdi A, Charoensaeng A, Sabatini DA, Scamehorn JF, Acosta EJ, Osathaphan K, Khaodhiar S. 2006a. Mixtures of Anionic and Cationic Surfactants with Single and Twin Head Groups: Adsorption and Precipitation Studies. J. of Surfactants and Detergents. 9 (1), 21-28.

Fuangswasdi A, Charoensaeng A, Sabatini DA, Scamehorn JF, Acosta EJ, Osathaphan K, Khaodhiar S. 2006. Mixtures of Anionic and Cationic Surfactants with Single and Twin Head Groups: Solubilization and Adsolubilization of Styrene and Ethylcyclohexane. J. of Surfactants and Detergents. 9(1), 29-37.

Garcia M, Gomez C, Niqui J, Ortega J. 2003. Biosurfactant and biodegradation enhanced partitioning of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from nonaquoeous phase liquids. Environ Sci Technol 37, 2988–2996

Gurein W, Jones G. 1988. Mineralization of phenanthrene by a Mycobacterium sp. Appl Environ Microbiol 54, 937–944.

Haigh S. 1996. A review of the interaction of surfactants with organic contaminants in soil. The Science of the Total Environment, 185, 161-170.

Jafvert CT. 1991. Sediment and saturated soil associated reactions involving an anionic surfactant (dodecylsulfate). 2. Partition of PAH compounds among phases. Environ Sci Technol, 25, 1039 –1045.

Jafvert CT y Heath JK. 1991. Sediment and Saturated Soil Associated Reactions Involving an Anionic Surfactant (Dodecylsulfate). 1. Precipitation and Micelle Formation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 25, 1031-1038.

Jiménez DJ, Medina SA, Gracida JN. 2010. Propiedades, aplicaciones y producción de biotensoactivos. Rev. Int. Contam. Ambient. 26 (1) 65-84.

Kang S-W, Kim Y-B, Shin J-D, Kim E-K. 2010. Enhanced Biodegradation of Hydrocarbons in Soil by Microbial Biosurfactant, Sophorolipid. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 160, 780–790

Kile DE y Chiou CT. 1989. Water solubility enhancement of DDT and trichloro-benzene by some surfactants below and above the critical micelle concentration. Environ Sci Technol, 23, 832 –838.

Kim HS, Jeon JW, Kim BH, Ahn CH, Oh CH, Yoon BD. 2006. Extracellular production of a glycolipid biosurfactant, mannos-ylerythritol lipid, by Candida sp. SY16 using fed-batch fermentation. Appl. Microbiol. Biot. 70, 391-396.

Knapp R, McInerney M, Nagle D, Folmsbee M, Maudgalya S. 2002. Development of a microbially enhanced oil recovery process for the Delaware Childers Field, Nowata County. Okla Geol Surv Circ 108, 193–200.

Krogh K, Halling-S. B, Mogensen B, Vejrup K. 2003. Environmental properties and effects of noionic surfactant adjuvants in pesticides: a review. Chemosphere. 50, 871-901

Lee D-H, Cody RD, Hoyle BL. 2001. Comparison of six surfactants in removing toluene and trichlorobenzene from a sandy soil under laboratory conditions. Can. Geotech. Journal, 38, 1329−1334.

Lee D-H, Kim E-S, Chang H-W. 2005. Effect of Tween surfactant components for remediation of toluene-contaminated groundwater. Geosciences Journal, 9(3), 261 – 267.

Lee D-H, Na I-W, Hwang K-Y. 2002. Korea Society of Economic and Environmental Geology, 35, 369−372.

Li J-L y Chen B-H. 2009. Surfactant-mediated Biodegradation of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons. ISSN 1996-1944. Materials. 2, 76-94.

Lopez J, Iturbe R, Torres LG. 2004. Washing of soil contaminated with PAHs and heavy petroleum fractions using two nonionic and one ionic surfactant: Effect of salt addition: Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A— Toxic/Hazardous Substances and Environmental Engineering. 39(9) 2293– 2306.

Makkar R y Rockne K. 2003. Comparison of synthetic surfactants and biosurfactants in enhancing degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Environ Toxicol Chem 22(10), 2280–2292.

Mata-Sandoval JC, Karns J, Torrents A. 2000. The influence of surfactants and biosurfactants on the bioavailability of hydrophobic organic pollutants in subsurface environments. Rev.Int. Contam. Ambient. 16 (4) 193-203.

Mezzanotte V, Castiglioni F, Todeschini R, Ravan M. 2003. Study on anaerobic and aerobic degradation of different nonionic surfactants. Bioresource Technology. 87, 87−91.

Muherei MA y Junin R. 2007. Potential of surfactant washing to solve drilling waste environmental problems offshore. Emirates Journal for Engineering Research, 12(2), 1-10.

Muherei MA y Junin R. 2008. Mixing Effect of Anionic and Nonionic Surfactants on Micellization, Adsorption and Partitioning of Nonionic Surfactant. Modern Applied Science, 2(3), 3-12.

Muherei MA y Junin R. 2009. Investigation Synergism in critical micelle Concentration of anionic-noionic surfactant mixtures: Surface versus Interfacial tension techniques. Asian J. Applied Sci. 2 (2), 115-127.

Mulligan CN, Yong RN, Gibbs BF. 2001. Surfactant-enhanced remediation of contaminated soil: A review. Eng. Geology 60, 371–380

Myers D. 1999. Surfaces, Interfaces, and Colloids: Principles and Applications. 2nd Edition. New York: Wiley-VCH, John Wiley and Sons.

Oh SG y Slattery JC. 1979. “Interfacial Tension Required for Significant Displacement of Residual Oil, Soc. Petrol Ena. J. of Am. Inst. Mech. Enars. 19(1), 83-90.

Okamoto N, Yoshimura T, Esumi K. 2004. Effect of pH on Adsolubilization of Single and Binary Organic Solutes into Cationic Hydrocarbon Surfactant Adsorbed Layer on Silica, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 275:612.

Paria S y Yuet PK. 2007. Adsorption of nonionic surfactants onto sand and its importance in naphthalene removal. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 46,108-113.

Pinto L y Moore M. 2000. Release of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from contaminated soils by surfactant and remediation of this effluent by Penicillium sp. Environ Toxicol Chem 19, 1741–1748.

Raiger-Iustman LJ y López NI. 2009. Los biosurfactantes y la industria petrolera. Rev. QuímicaViva 3(8), 146-161.

Ramírez WF, Rondon IS, Eslava PR. 2005. Surfactantes asociados a herbicidas: efectos sobre organismos acuáticos. Rev.Orinoquia, 9(2), 45-59.

Rivas H y Gutiérrez X. 1999. Los surfactantes: comportamiento y algunas de sus aplicaciones en la industria petrolera. Acta Científica Venezolana. 50(1), 54-65.

Rodriguez MS, Sanchez MJ, Sanchez M. 2005. A Comparative Study of Adsorption of an Anionic and a Nonionic Surfactant by Soils Based on Physicochemical and Mineralogical Properties of Soils. Chemosphere 61, 56-64.

Rosen MJ. 1989. Surfactants and Interfacial Phenomena, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, New York.125−431.

Sabatini DA, Childs J, Scamehorn J. 2001. Surfactant-Enhanced Treatment of Oil-Contaminated Soils and Oil-Based Drilling Cuttings – Annual Report. EPA Grant Number: R827015C009.

Sabatini DA, Knox RK, Harwell JH, Wu B. 2000. Integrated Design of Surfactant Enhanced DNAPL Remediation: Efficient Supersolubilization and Gradient Systems, J. Contam. Hydrol. 45:99.

Singh A, Van Hamme JD, Ward O. 2007. Surfactants in microbiology and biotechnology: Part 2. Application aspects . Biotechnol Adv 25, 99 – 121.

Somasundaran P y Zhang L. 2006. Adsorption of Surfactants on Minerals for Wettability Control in Improved Oil Recovery Process. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 52, 198-212.

Sun S, Inskeep WP, Boyd SA. 1995. Sorption of nonionic organic compounds in soil water systems containing a micelleforming surfactant. Environmental Science and Technology, 29, 903−913.

Tiehm A. 1994. Degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the presence of synthetic surfactants. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60, 258-263.

Torres LG, Rojas N, Iturbe R. 2004. Use of twosurfactants mixtures to attain specific HLB values for assisted TPH-diesel biodegradation: Journal of Environmental Sciences (China). 16(6), 950–956.

Torres LG, Orantes JL, Iturbe R. 2003. Critical micellar concentrations for three surfactants and their diesel-removal efficiencies in petroleum contaminated soils. Environmental Geosciences. 10(1), 28–36.

Torres LG, Lemus X, Urquiza G, Verdejo A, Iturbe R. 2005. Surfactant enhanced washing of drilling fluids, a promising remediation technique. Tenside Surfactant Detergents. 42(6) 347–355.

Torres LG, Orantes JL, Iturbe R. 2006. Biodegradation of Two Nonionic Surfactants Used for In Situ Flushing of Oil-Contaminated Soils. Tenside Surfactant Detergents, 43(5), 251–255.

Torres LG y Zamora ER. 2002. Preparation and power consumption of surfactant fuel oil–water emulsions using axial, radial, and mixed flow impellers. Fuel. 81, 2289–2302.

Urum K, Pekdemir T, Copur M. 2004. Surfactant Treatment of Crude Oil Contaminated Soils. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 276, 456-464.

Verma S, Kumar VV. 1998. Relationship between Oil-Water Interfacial Tension and Oily Soil Removal in Mixed Surfactant Systems. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 207, 1-10.

Volkering F, Breure AM, Rulkens WH. 1998. Microbiological aspects of surfactant use for biological soil remediation. Biodegradation 8, 401–417.

Vreysen S y Maes A. 2005. Remediation of a Diesel Contaminated, Sandy-Loam Soil Using Low Concentrated Surfactant Solutions. JSS–J Soils & Sediments. 5(4) 240–244.

Wang D. 2002. A study of identifying the emulsion type of surfactant: Volume balance value. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 247, 389−396.

Youssef NH, Nguyen T, Sabatini DA, McInerney MJ. 2007. Basis for formulating biosurfactant mixtures to achieve ultra low interfacial tension values against hydrocarbons. J. Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 34, 497–507.

Zhang R y Somasundaran P. 2006. Advances in Adsorption of Surfactants and Their Mixtures at Solid/Solution Interfaces. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science 123-126, 213-229.

Zhao B, Chen X, Zhu K, Zhu L. 2007. Micellar solubilization of TCE and PCE by mixed surfactant: effects of surfactant partitioning and DNAPL mixing. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Eng. Aspects. 296, 167-173.

Zheng ZM y Obbard JP. 2002. Evaluation of an elevated non-ionic surfactant critical micelle concentration in a soilyaqueous system. Water Res. 36, 2667 –2672.

Zhu K, Hart W, Yang J. 2005. Remediation of Petroleum-Contaminated Loess Soil by Surfactant-Enhanced Flushing Technique. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, 40, 1877–1893.

Zhu L, Yang K, Lou B, Yuan B. 2003. A MultiComponent Static Analysis for the Influence of Sediment/Soil Composition on the Sorption of a Nonionic Surfactant (Triton X-100) onto Natural Sediments/Soil. Water Research. 37, 80-4792.

Cómo citar
Riojas González, H. H., Gortáres Moroyoqui, P., Mondaca Fernández, I., & Balderas Cortes, J. de J. (2016). Influencia de los Surfactantes en la Remediación de Suelos Contaminados con Hidrocarburo. Revista Facultad De Ciencias Básicas, 7(1), 94-115.
Crossref Cited-by logo

Más sobre este tema