El gobierno corporativo en el ámbito del sector público: un estudio bibliométrico en las revistas ubicadas en el área de Administración Pública

  • Jesús Mauricio Flórez Parra Universidad de Granada-España
Palabras clave: Gobierno corporativo, sector público, revistas internacionales, bibliométrico, transparencia

Resumen

Esta investigación se centra en un estudio bibliométrico comprendido entre los años 2007-2015. Se analizan las temáticas más relevantes y significativas, las universidades que investigan el fenómeno del gobierno corporativo (GC) en el ámbito público y las revistas que abordan esta temática. Para este fin, se tomaron las 47 revistas de mayor prestigio e impacto internacional incluidas en Public Administration. El análisis de los resultados pone sobre el relieve la implementación del GC en el sector público en áreas como la educación, la sanidad o los gobiernos locales y el predominio que ejerce la cultura anglosajona a través de las diversas revistas académicas del Journal Citation Reports.

Biografía del autor/a

Jesús Mauricio Flórez Parra, Universidad de Granada-España
Doctor en Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales por la Universidad de Granada-España, Departamente de Economía Financiera y Contabilidad.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Lenguajes:

es

Biografía del autor/a

Jesús Mauricio Flórez Parra, Universidad de Granada-España
Doctor en Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales por la Universidad de Granada-España, Departamente de Economía Financiera y Contabilidad.

Referencias bibliográficas

Academic Ranking of World Universities (AMRU) (2015). Shanghai. Recuperado el 16 de julio de 2016, de http://www.shanghairanking.com/es/ARWU2015.html

Adut, D., Holder, A. & Robin, A. (2013). Predictive versus opportunistic earnings management, executive compensation, and firm performance. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 32(3), 126-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2013.02.007

Bartki, H., Rivard, S. & Talbot, J. (1988). An Information Systems Keyword Classification Scheme. MIS Quarterly, 12(2), 299-322. https://doi.org/10.2307/248855

Bordons, M. & Zulueta, Mª. (1999). Evaluación de la actividad científica a través de indicadores bibliométricos. Revista Espa-ola de Cardiología, (52)10, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0300-8932(99)75008-6

Bozec, R., Zéghal, D. & Boujenoui, A. (2004). The effect of the reform of Canadian state-owned enterprises on major corporate governance mechanisms. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 63(2), 79-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2004.00380.x

Braadbaart, O. & Yusnandarshah, B. (2008). Public Sector Benchmarking: a Survey of Scientific articles, 1990-2005. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 74(3), 421-433. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852308095311

Cadbury, A. (1992). Informe de comité sobre los aspectos financieros del gobierno corporativo. Recuperado el 16 de junio de 2014, de http://www.ecgi.org/codes/documents/cadbury.pdf

Carnegie, G. & Tuck, J. (2010). Understanding the ABC of University Governance. The Australian Journal of Public Administration, 69(4), 431–441. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2010.00699.x

Carver, J. (2010). A case for global governance theory: practitioners avoid it, academics narrow it, the world needs it. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(2), 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00785.x

Cernat, L. (2004). The emerging European corporate governance model: Anglo-Saxon, Continental, or still the century of diversity? Journal of European Public Policy, 11(1), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350176042000164343

Christopher, J. (2015). Internal audit Does it enhance governance in the Australian public university sector? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(6), 954-971. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214543206

Clatworthy, A., Mellett, J. & Peel, J. (2000). Corporate Governance under `New Public Management': an Exemplification. Corporate Governance, 8(2), 166-176 https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00193

Cuervo, A. (2002). Corporate Governance Mechanisms: a plea for less code of good governance and more market control. Corporate Governance, 10(2), 84-93 https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00272

Cuomo, F., Mallin, C. & Zattoni, A. (2016). Corporate Governance Codes: A Review and Research Agenda. Corporate governance: an international review, 24(3), 222-241. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12148

Davis, J, Schoorman, F. & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 2-47.

De Boer, H., Enders, J. & Leisyte, L. (2007). Public sector reform in dutch higher education: the organizational transformation of the university. Public Administration, 85(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00632.x

Dent, M., Gestel, N. & Teelken, C. (2007). Symposium on Changing Modes of Governance in Public Sector Organizations: Action and Rhetoric. Public Administration, 85(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00630.x

Donaldson, L. & Davis, J. (1991). Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16, 49-64. https://doi.org/10.1177/031289629101600103

Donaldson, T. & Preston, L. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-91

Durisin, B. & Puzone, F. (2009). Maturation of corporate governance research, 1993–2007: an assessment. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 266-291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00739.x

Durisin, B., Calabretta, G. & Parmeggiani, V. (2010). The Intellectual Structure of Product Innovation Research: A Bibliometric Study of the Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1984–2004. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27, 437-451. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00726.x

Ferlie, E., Ashburner, L. & Fitzgerald, L. (1995). corporate governance and the public sector: some issues and evidence from the NHS. Public Administration, 73(2), 375-392. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1995.tb00834.x

Flórez, J. (2013). El gobierno corporativo en el sector público: Un estudio en las universidades públicas espa-olas. Cuadernos de Administración, 29(50), 142-152.

Flórez, J., López, M. & López, A. (2014a). El gobierno corporativo de las universidades: Estudio de las cien primeras universidades del ranking de Shanghái. Revista de Educación, 364, 170-196.

Flórez, J., López, M. & López, A. (2014b). Gobierno corporativo y sector público: un estudio bibliométrico en las principales revistas ISI. Innovar, 24(51), 79-98. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v24n51.41489

Freeman, E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman.

Freeman, E. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4), 409-421. https://doi.org/10.2307/3857340

Garand, J. C. (1990). An alternative interpretation of recent polticial science journal evaluations. Political Science and Politics, 23(3), 448-451. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096500033321

Gómez, P. & Korine, H. (2005). Democracy and the evolution of corporate governance. Corporate Governance, 13(16), 739-752. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2005.00467.x

Hacen, M. (2011). Antecedents of organizational innovation the diffusion of new public management into danish local government. Public Administration, 89(2), 285–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01855.x

Hardman, B. (1996). Corporate governance: a practical guide for directors and secretaries. Australian Company Secretary, July, 235–242

Haxhi, I., Ees, H. & Sorge, A. (2013). A political perspective on business elites and institutional embeddedness in the uk code‐issuing process. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21(6), 535-546. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12036

Ho, Chi-K. (2005). Corporate governance and corporate competitiveness: an international analysis. Corporate Governance, 13(2), 211-253. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2005.00419.x

Hodges, R., Wright, M. & Keasey, K. (1996). Corporate governance in the public services: concepts and issues. Public Money and Management, 16(2), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540969609387915

Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x

Hooghiemstra, R. & Van Ees, H. (2011). Uniformity as response to soft law: evidence from compliance and non‐compliance with the Dutch corporate governance code. Regulation & Governance, 5(4), 480-498. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2011.01118.x

Howard, C. & Seth-Purdie, R. (2005). Governance Issues for Public Sector Boards. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 64(3), 56-68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2005.00452.x

James, O. (2001). Business Models and the Transfer of Businesslike Central Government Agencies. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 14(2), 233-252. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0491.00159

Jensen, M. & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Journal Citation Reports (JCR) (2015). Institute for Scientific Information. Recuperado el 16 de julio de 2016, de http://biblioteca.ugr.es/pages/biblioteca_electronica/bases_datos/journal-citation-reportssocial-sciences

Kellough, J. & Pitts, D. (2005). Who contributes to public administration review? Examining the charactristics of Authors Who Submit Manuscripts to the Journal. Public administration Review, 65(1), 3-7 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00425.x

La Porta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R. (2000). Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 58, 3-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(00)00065-9

Lan, Z. & Anders, K. (2000). A paradigmatic view of contemporary public administration research: an empirical test. Administration and Society, 32(2), 138-165. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953990022019380

Lazonick, W. & O'Sullivan, M. (2000). Maximizing shareholder value: a new ideology for corporate governance. Economy and Society, 29(1), 13-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/030851400360541

Lee, J. & Vicente, J. (2005). Bibliometric analysis of human factors (1970–2000): a quantitative description of scientific impact. Human Factors, 47(4), 753–766. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872005775570970

Legge, J. Jr. & Devore, J. (1987). Measuring Productivity in U.S. Public Administration and public Affair Programs 1981-1985. Administration and Society, 19(2), 147-156 https://doi.org/10.1177/009539978701900201

Lokuwaduge, C. & Armstrong, A. (2015). The impact of governance on the performance of the higher education sector in Australia. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(5), 811-827. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214535740

Luan, Jung-Ch. & Tang, Je-m. (2007). Where is Independent Director Efficacy? Corporate Governance, 15(4), 636-643. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00593.x

Nord, J. & Nord, G. (1995). MIS research: Journal status and analysis. Information and Management, 29(1), 29-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-7206(95)00010-T

Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económico (OCDE) (2004). Principios del Gobierno Corporativo. Recuperado el 14 de octubre de 2014, de http://www.oecd.org/daf/ca/corporategovernanceprinciples/37191543.pdf

Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económico (OCDE) (2005). Directrices sobre el Gobierno Corporativo de Empresas Públicas. Recuperado el 14 de octubre 2014, de http://www.ecgi.org/codes/documents/oecd_soe_en.pdf

Plümber, T. & Radaelli, C. (2004). Publish or perish: publications and citations of italian political scientists in international political socience jornals, 1990-2002. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(6), 1112-1127. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350176042000298138

Ramos-Rodríguez, A. & Ruíz-Navarro, J. (2004). Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: a bibliometric study of the strategic management journal, 1980–2000. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 981–1004. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.397

Rhodes, R. (1996). The new governance: governing without government. Political Studies, 44(4), 652-667. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb01747.x

Rodgers, T., Freeman, R., Williams, J. & Kane, D (2011). Students and the governance of higher education: A UK perspective. Tertiary Education and Management, 17(3), 247-260 https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2011.586046

Ryan, C. & Ng, W. (2000). Public sector corporate governance disclosures: an examination of annual reporting practices in Queensland. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 59(2), 11-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.00148

Ryan, C., Stanley, T. & Nelson, M. (2002). Accountability disclosures by queensland local government councils: 1997-1999. Financial Accountability & Management, 18(3), 261-289. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0408.00153

Stewart, J. Asha, F. Shulman, A. & Ng, C. (2012). Governance disclosure on the internet: the case of australian state government departments. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 71(4), 440–456. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2012.00789.x

Taylor, M. (2013). Shared governance in the modern university. Higher Education Quarterly, 67(1), 80-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12003

Veronesi, G. & Keasey, K. (2010). NHS boards: knowing the 'what' but not the 'how'. Public Money & Management, 30(6), 363-370. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2010.525005

Weimer, J. & Pape, J. (1999). A taxonomy of systems of corporate governance. Corporate Governance, 7(2), 152-166. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00143

Wellens, L. & Jegers, M. (2011). Beneficiaries' participation in nonprofit organizations: a theory-based approach. Public Money & Management, 31(3), 175-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2011.573227

Whiteoak, J. (1996). Corporate governance—why local government should manage its own agenda. Public Money & Management, 16(2), 23-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540969609387917

Cómo citar
Flórez Parra, J. M. (2016). El gobierno corporativo en el ámbito del sector público: un estudio bibliométrico en las revistas ubicadas en el área de Administración Pública. Revista Facultad De Ciencias Económicas, 25(1), 161–175. https://doi.org/10.18359/rfce.743
Publicado
2016-12-06
Sección
Artículos

Métricas

QR Code